However it is worth pondering that some people in the URC don't feel that there is a lot in common with others in the URC. I suspect it has a number of roots.
- Firstly I think that some of it is due to our independent spirit. The feeling that the way the our URC does things is the way our URC does thing and is a full legitimate way of being URC in all its idiosyncrasy.
- Secondly I think that when people start to encounter other URC congregations there is surprise at the different valid forms of being URC that others have. It is a richness but it also starts many people asking about what does it mean to be URC.
- Thirdly I think there is some genuine bewilderment at the diversity, especially on certain hot issues.
- However I suspect there is some importing of the Anglican discourse where there are real and current power struggles going on. The question is if the Anglican's are having such a difficulty on keeping their show on the road, why aren't these issues causing us equally difficulty.
- our independent heritage which leaves us with a much more bottom up structure than the Anglican Communion,
- the commitment to unity and therefore travelling together,
- that tensions have been faced at other stages, remember what the 1990s were like anyone?
- conditionality of our understanding of revelation which results in a blurred identity
- that we have several not just one hot topic, anyone fancy a round on whether its necessary for a Christian to be pacifist?
No comments:
Post a Comment