It has just occurred that the reason the centre has grown in the URC and the periphery diminished is the way we set our finances. At the moment the finances are a levy which the centre sets on all the local churches. The problem with this is that the centre can see work to do, and then set the levy to pay for it. Once or twice this does not matter.
Under the old Congregational Union, the local churches had far more say over what the levy was and when it was to high simply did not pay it. The centre thus had to decide what best to do with what was given.
So we need to redress the balance of power and put power back into the hands of local churches. One way would be to have a scrutinising body of church treasures to look at the levy. I would suggest that for national each synod would send one church treasurer to a central committee, each appointment lasting five years. In each synod a body of about the same size 12 people should also sit, the rule being for a member that they have to be a church secretary. This would mean a meeting once a year before a synod and it is this body and not the central finance people who should bring the levy.
Such people are a lot better placed than either a full synod or central staff to make these decisions. They can be fully briefed on the central issues but are also well aware of the local church finances as well.
This is not a quick fix, it will not work overnight and it will not bring about immediate cuts. What I expect it to do is over twenty years to consistently reduce the central bureaucracy so that local churches are empowered to carry out their mission or not as they see fit. The only long term way to keep control of expenditure is to put people in control of it who have an interest in keeping it low.
Labels
accountability
agency
alcoholism
Alisdair MacIntyre
Anglican attitudes
Anglican communion
appreciation
approach
attitudes
audience
bad situations
Bible
binge drinking
blindness
call
Calvin
campaigning
change
chaos
Christian discipleship
Christmas
Church
church structures
coincidence
colonialism
committees
Communion
communities
community
Congregationalism
congregations
consumption;
conversion
councils
creation
crossing
culture
curiosity
customers
debate
debt
democracy
depression
Design Argument
desire
discrimination
dissenting
diversity
doctorates
doctors
dominance
drinking problem
Easter
ecumenics
Ecumenism
elderly
elements
Enlightenment
environment; fairness
episcopal churches
eternal life
ethics
evangelism
evolution
excess
Facebook
faith
faithful
fencing the table
finance
fishing
forgiveness
fowler
fraud
Free Churches
freedom
friendly
full time
gathered church
generosity
generous
gift or goal
God
gratitude
greetings
growth
heaven
history
holy
holy spirit
humanity
Humpty Dumpty
Hunter
hypocrisy
integration
Internet
invitation
Jesus Army
joining
Joy
laity
Liturgy
local congregations
love
MaM
mental health
merging
misrepresentation
mission
my experience
offices of the church
oil
open communion
outreach
p-values
pacifism
part time
passion
paths
Paul
pen names
power
preparedness
Presbyterian Blue
Presbyterianism
procedures.
progress
proxies
publishing culture
purpose
radical welcome
rant
Reformed tradition
refugees support
regression to the mean
relationships
replicability
respect
response
responsibility
ressurection
role
Ruth and Naomi
savouring
Scottish Congregational and United Reformed College
Scottish heritage
security
self esteem
situatedness
snow
Society for Liturgical Studies
soldiers
spiralling inwards
statistics
student fees
subordinate standards
substantial agreement
suffering
superhuman
symbolism
symbols
synods
tax
tee total
tension
the way of the cross
theologians
theologians in residence
thesis
time
triedness
United Reformed Church
unity
Universities
urban priority areas
URC
vocation
vulnerablility
Wardlaw
weakness
welcome
welcoming
young or old
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment