I have heard this several times. It sounds good even to me and if properly understood it is true but it is rarely understood. It is interpreted to mean "All we need to do is to keep going as we are." That is dangerous, a false lie, it is the modern equivalent of the servant who was given one talent and chose to bury it in the ground.
The key word is Faithful. Most people associate faithfulness with things staying the same, with remaining as we are, with keeping the status quo. However faithfulness is one of relationship, it is not faithful to suggest inside a relationship that both people must remain the same to keep things as they are, there must in any relationship be space to grow and change. Indeed faithfulness is altering a relationship to accept the change in another. What would we think of mother who kept her baby in nappies as that was a way to faithful or insisted in carrying the child everywhere no matter how big they grew. I think we would feel that such a person was psychologically in trouble. We know in our relationships with other people that being faithful is actually a matter of continual change.
So it is with God, the call for the church to be faithful is not a call for the church to be static but a call for the church to adapt its relationship to God as its circumstances and understandings of God change. Fighting to keep things the same because that is being faithful, is a failure of relationship, and far from being faithful it is highly unfaithful.
Labels
accountability
agency
alcoholism
Alisdair MacIntyre
Anglican attitudes
Anglican communion
appreciation
approach
attitudes
audience
bad situations
Bible
binge drinking
blindness
call
Calvin
campaigning
change
chaos
Christian discipleship
Christmas
Church
church structures
coincidence
colonialism
committees
Communion
communities
community
Congregationalism
congregations
consumption;
conversion
councils
creation
crossing
culture
curiosity
customers
debate
debt
democracy
depression
Design Argument
desire
discrimination
dissenting
diversity
doctorates
doctors
dominance
drinking problem
Easter
ecumenics
Ecumenism
elderly
elements
Enlightenment
environment; fairness
episcopal churches
eternal life
ethics
evangelism
evolution
excess
Facebook
faith
faithful
fencing the table
finance
fishing
forgiveness
fowler
fraud
Free Churches
freedom
friendly
full time
gathered church
generosity
generous
gift or goal
God
gratitude
greetings
growth
heaven
history
holy
holy spirit
humanity
Humpty Dumpty
Hunter
hypocrisy
integration
Internet
invitation
Jesus Army
joining
Joy
laity
Liturgy
local congregations
love
MaM
mental health
merging
misrepresentation
mission
my experience
offices of the church
oil
open communion
outreach
p-values
pacifism
part time
passion
paths
Paul
pen names
power
preparedness
Presbyterian Blue
Presbyterianism
procedures.
progress
proxies
publishing culture
purpose
radical welcome
rant
Reformed tradition
refugees support
regression to the mean
relationships
replicability
respect
response
responsibility
ressurection
role
Ruth and Naomi
savouring
Scottish Congregational and United Reformed College
Scottish heritage
security
self esteem
situatedness
snow
Society for Liturgical Studies
soldiers
spiralling inwards
statistics
student fees
subordinate standards
substantial agreement
suffering
superhuman
symbolism
symbols
synods
tax
tee total
tension
the way of the cross
theologians
theologians in residence
thesis
time
triedness
United Reformed Church
unity
Universities
urban priority areas
URC
vocation
vulnerablility
Wardlaw
weakness
welcome
welcoming
young or old
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I completely agree...I've thought that to remain faithful to a person isn't about not changing things so much as being willing to stick with the person through 'thick and thin'. I guess the same could be said about the church.
ReplyDeleteGood blog, btw!