It is always assumed that growth is good and that congregations are always in favour of growth. I have come to the conclusion that a congregation may well be cautious about growth and that the reasons they are cautious are powerful reasons.
Firstly the easiest one to get hold of. Growth implies change. It is highly unlikely that if you attract new people to join you that they will be exactly in the same mould as current members. Simply because if they were the chances are they would already be members. Now it is true that the people comining in will change to fit in with the congregation, but to a lesser extent the congregation will have to change to fit with the new members. However many people in the church look for to the church as a place of stability in a world of change. The idea that new people coming into the church will change how the congregation does things, is not attractive.
Secondly new people within the congregation are very likely to reset where the power exactly lies. This may be because they happen to relate more easily to one group of current members than another. This may be because they have specific skills, this maybe because they naturally do things differently and thus question the common place assumptions of the congregation. When power starts to move between people it is an uncomfortable experience.
Thirdly size makes a difference to how you can do things. A congregation that likes to do things together, to involve everyone and does not like to be separated up, is going to find it has it increases size to over one hundred it is harder and harder to do things that way. This is because humans do not sustain endless relationships but normally about 150. You simply have to work much harder to be tight knit sort of congregation if you have 150 members than you do if you have 50 members. I suspect congregations over 250 simply don't function that way.
Fourthly outreach seems to me to entail a level of being open and vulnerable, that a congregation has to be open to rejection by people outside it, to being told it is not wanted and probably to having things not done how it would like them if it is truly to engage with people who are outside the church.
Labels
accountability
agency
alcoholism
Alisdair MacIntyre
Anglican attitudes
Anglican communion
appreciation
approach
attitudes
audience
bad situations
Bible
binge drinking
blindness
call
Calvin
campaigning
change
chaos
Christian discipleship
Christmas
Church
church structures
coincidence
colonialism
committees
Communion
communities
community
Congregationalism
congregations
consumption;
conversion
councils
creation
crossing
culture
curiosity
customers
debate
debt
democracy
depression
Design Argument
desire
discrimination
dissenting
diversity
doctorates
doctors
dominance
drinking problem
Easter
ecumenics
Ecumenism
elderly
elements
Enlightenment
environment; fairness
episcopal churches
eternal life
ethics
evangelism
evolution
excess
Facebook
faith
faithful
fencing the table
finance
fishing
forgiveness
fowler
fraud
Free Churches
freedom
friendly
full time
gathered church
generosity
generous
gift or goal
God
gratitude
greetings
growth
heaven
history
holy
holy spirit
humanity
Humpty Dumpty
Hunter
hypocrisy
integration
Internet
invitation
Jesus Army
joining
Joy
laity
Liturgy
local congregations
love
MaM
mental health
merging
misrepresentation
mission
my experience
offices of the church
oil
open communion
outreach
p-values
pacifism
part time
passion
paths
Paul
pen names
power
preparedness
Presbyterian Blue
Presbyterianism
procedures.
progress
proxies
publishing culture
purpose
radical welcome
rant
Reformed tradition
refugees support
regression to the mean
relationships
replicability
respect
response
responsibility
ressurection
role
Ruth and Naomi
savouring
Scottish Congregational and United Reformed College
Scottish heritage
security
self esteem
situatedness
snow
Society for Liturgical Studies
soldiers
spiralling inwards
statistics
student fees
subordinate standards
substantial agreement
suffering
superhuman
symbolism
symbols
synods
tax
tee total
tension
the way of the cross
theologians
theologians in residence
thesis
time
triedness
United Reformed Church
unity
Universities
urban priority areas
URC
vocation
vulnerablility
Wardlaw
weakness
welcome
welcoming
young or old
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I agree with you, I've seen the first point in action when a church near a friend started getting new people. The congregation was close-knit, mostly older adults, and often had been going to the church for a long time. When some younger people started joining, the church had to 'make room' for them: they started things like singles' study groups that you might find in a larger church. It's not that this was bad so much as the church didn't really have the room or resources needed for these things, and the congregation before had its own way of doing things. I'm not sure how it turned out but I wanted to say that I knew of 'real-life' examples of your point.
ReplyDelete-BD